Second DUI · ARD

Can I get ARD for a second DUI in PA?

Usually not, and the statutory bar is specific.

Free & confidential · Usually a same-day callback

  • Practicing since 2001
  • Member, National College for DUI Defense (NCDD)
  • Five-star reviewed
  • BBB A+ Rated

The short answer

Usually not, and the statutory bar is specific. 75 Pa.C.S. § 3807(a)(2): "The attorney for the Commonwealth shall not submit a charge brought under this chapter for Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition if any of the following apply:"[1]

  • (i) the ten-year bar on a prior § 3802 conviction or ARD;
  • (ii) an accident in connection with the events surrounding the current offense in which an individual other than the defendant was killed or suffered serious bodily injury; or
  • (iii) a passenger under 14 years of age in the motor vehicle the defendant was operating.

The ten-year bar, word for word

§ 3807(a)(2)(i): "The defendant has been found guilty of or accepted Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition of a charge brought under section 3802 within ten years of the date of the current offense unless the charge was for an ungraded misdemeanor under section 3802(a)(2) and was the defendant's first offense under section 3802."

The ten years runs from the date of the current offense. That is the detail most often stated wrongly.

The exception is narrow and turns on how the earlier charge was graded[2] . An attorney can confirm whether it reaches a particular record.

Even with no bar, ARD is the DA's call

Under § 3807(a)(1), even where no bar applies, the defendant "may be considered by the attorney for the Commonwealth." Admission is the District Attorney's decision, and counties publish their own additional criteria. Two counties show how differently that plays out:

  • Lancaster County — the District Attorney's office publishes its own exclusion list for DUI ARD. As published, an applicant is excluded if there was a DUI conviction or an ARD acceptance within ten years of the current offense; if a crash connected to the offense killed or seriously injured someone other than the applicant; if a passenger under 14 was in the vehicle; if the applicant was driving without a valid license, driving while suspended, or driving without insurance, regardless of whether the applicant was charged with those specific offenses; if the driving record is extensive as determined by the DA's office; if the BAC was .240% or above; if opioids, methamphetamine, hallucinogens, dissociative anesthetics or their derivatives or analogues were in the blood; or if the applicant held a CDL at the time of the offense. The office also reserves the right to reject an application for reasons not on the list. See Lancaster DUI defense.

Shifflett and § 3802(h): Driving under the influence of alcohol or controlled substance following diversion

In Commonwealth v. Shifflett, 335 A.3d 1158 (Pa. 2025), decided May 30, 2025, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held 75 Pa.C.S. § 3806 facially unconstitutional to the extent it allowed a prior acceptance of ARD to be used as the basis for an enhanced sentence under § 3804. The Court severed only that ARD provision and left the rest of § 3806 standing, and it expressly declined to rule on the other categories of prior offense. The official statutory note says simply that "Section 3806 was declared unconstitutional," but that note is broader than the decision: § 3806 remains in force apart from the invalidated ARD provision.[7] [5]

The General Assembly has since responded. Act 58 of 2025, effective December 22, 2025, states that its intent is to address Shifflett. Rather than treating ARD as a prior offense, it created a separate offense at 75 Pa.C.S. § 3802(h)(1): driving in violation of § 3802(a) through (f) within 10 years after completing ARD, or a substantially similar out-of-state diversion program. Section 3803(c) grades that offense, and § 3806(b)(4) provides that where the ARD completion date is more than 10 years before the current offense, a prior § 3802(h)(1) conviction is treated as a prior offense for the underlying § 3802 violation.[6] [3] [4]

The practical point for someone with a past ARD is this: Shifflett does not mean a prior ARD is now irrelevant. Under the law in force today, a DUI within 10 years of completing ARD is charged as its own offense under § 3802(h). How that applies depends on your ARD completion date and the subsection you are charged under, and it is worth reviewing with a lawyer.

If ARD is barred

  • · County DUI treatment or diversion tracks, where they exist.
  • · Challenging the stop or the testing.
  • · The grading consequences under § 3803, which drive the penalties under § 3804[8] .

More on the Pennsylvania ARD program.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions.

Common questions about ARD on a second Pennsylvania DUI.

  • Usually not. Under 75 Pa.C.S. § 3807(a)(2)(i), the attorney for the Commonwealth shall not submit a DUI charge for ARD if the defendant has been found guilty of or accepted ARD of a charge under § 3802 within ten years of the date of the current offense, unless the earlier charge was an ungraded misdemeanor under § 3802(a)(2) and was the defendant's first offense under § 3802.

  • The ten years runs from the date of the current offense — not from the date of the earlier conviction or sentence, and not from the date you apply for ARD. That is the detail most often stated wrongly.

  • The bar does not apply if the earlier charge was for an ungraded misdemeanor under § 3802(a)(2) and was the defendant's first offense under § 3802. The exception is narrow and turns on how the earlier charge was graded; an attorney can confirm whether it reaches a particular record.

  • Under § 3807(a)(2)(ii) and (iii), ARD is barred where there was an accident in connection with the events surrounding the current offense in which an individual other than the defendant was killed or suffered serious bodily injury, or where there was a passenger under 14 years of age in the motor vehicle the defendant was operating.

  • No. Under § 3807(a)(1) the defendant "may be considered by the attorney for the Commonwealth" — admission is the District Attorney's decision, and counties publish their own additional criteria.

  • The practical point for someone with a past ARD is this: Shifflett does not mean a prior ARD is now irrelevant. Under the law in force today, a DUI within 10 years of completing ARD is charged as its own offense under § 3802(h). How that applies depends on your ARD completion date and the subsection you are charged under, and it is worth reviewing with a lawyer. Act 58 of 2025 created § 3802(h), "Driving under the influence of alcohol or controlled substance following diversion."

Sources & statutory citations

  1. [1]75 Pa.C.S. § 3807 — Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition (ARD) for DUI.
  2. [2]75 Pa.C.S. § 3802 — DUI — offense definitions and BAC/impairment tiers.
  3. [3]75 Pa.C.S. § 3802(h) — DUI following diversion (Act 58 of 2025, eff. 12/22/2025) — new DUI within 10 years of completing ARD or a substantially similar out-of-state pretrial diversion program. Under § 3802(h)(2) the prior-diversion element is provable only by a certified PennDOT record under § 6328, a clerk-of-courts record, or a substantially similar certified record from another jurisdiction.
  4. [4]75 Pa.C.S. § 3803 — Grading. For a violation of § 3802(c) or (d), or § 3802(a)(1) with a refusal: an ungraded misdemeanor with no prior offenses under § 3803(b)(2), a misdemeanor of the first degree with one prior under § 3803(b)(4), a felony of the third degree with two priors under § 3803(b)(4.1)(i), and a felony of the second degree with three or more under § 3803(b)(4.1)(ii).
  5. [5]75 Pa.C.S. § 3806 — Prior-offense look-back rules. After Shifflett, ARD may not be used as a judge-found prior offense to enhance a § 3804 sentence; Act 58 separately created § 3802(h).
  6. [6]Act 58 of 2025 — Creates a separate 'DUI following diversion' offense addressing Commonwealth v. Shifflett; does not reclassify prior ARD as a §3806 prior offense.
  7. [7]Commonwealth v. Shifflett, 335 A.3d 1158 (Pa. 2025) — Section 3806 was facially unconstitutional insofar as it allowed prior ARD acceptance to enhance a sentence under § 3804 without the constitutional safeguards required for a prior conviction.
  8. [8]75 Pa.C.S. § 3804 — DUI penalty tiers, mandatory minimums, license suspension, ignition interlock.

Statutes are summarized for public reference. Confirm current text at palegis.us. This page is attorney advertising, not legal advice.

Free case review

(717) 724-7503

Reviewed personally by Sean P. Quinlan, Esq. · PA attorney since 2001 · Reply usually same business day.

Free consultation · Calls answered now

The sooner we talk, the more we can do.

Every hour matters in a DUI or criminal case. Call directly and speak with Attorney Quinlan — not an intake desk.